Sunday, 10 April 2016

Movie Impressions: Dawn of Justice




This is how it starts, the fever, the rage, the feeling of powerlessness; turns good men, cruel”. I believe Alfred (played brilliantly by Jeremy Irons) perfectly summarizes my emotions as I saw these once beloved beacons of hope turned into sad, depressed murderers. I felt helpless that I couldn’t do anything about it as I treaded through the long muddled story. Now to be fair, this movie had a very huge task to pull off. Not only did it had to introduce Batman to the current DC Extended Universe, introduce Wonder Woman in her big screen début and set-up Justice League, while living up to the hype of ‘Batman vs. Superman’ that have kept fans eagerly waiting for decades. It seems that the problem is pretty straight-forward, it tried to be too many things at once and an off-beat direction for these heroes made everything fall flat (for me).

The story has an interesting premise though. 18 months after the events of Man of Steel, Superman is out into the world. And with the destruction he has caused, everyone is not very happy. And that includes Bruce Wayne, who we see driving through the debris as Superman and General Zod fight, only to see his office building collapse before his eyes with dozens of his employees falling to their deaths. When Wayne looks up at the flying gods, while comforting a child who just lost her mom in the incident, he boils with rage. This gives such a good set up for Batman’s stance in this movie. The way it is shot is genuinely terrifying and makes us feel emotion despite being a re-tread of the fight of the last movie. I just wish that this kind of execution remained consistent throughout the movie.

Nevertheless, it was a mess. Very early on it awkwardly starts to cut in between all these storylines and subplots that can really make finding a clear narrative rather tedious and confusing, and it is not an excuse for a ‘complex’ story. As you must have seen other reviews, I too agree that a lot of these scenes could have been cut to make time or replaced with scenes that more clearly forward the story (especially the Pa Kent scene).The Justice League tie-ins also are pretty lazy and are just dumped on you all at once, that breaks the flow of the movie right at its peak of conflict. All the character motivations except Batman’s were pretty thin, and a lot of the time people are left filling the blanks which causes all sorts of ambiguity that can change how you perceive the story. It also has these wonky character arcs that no have no sense of progression and just somehow happen. Ultimately, it’s a lot of great ideas but the movie wasn’t able to work with them in a cohesive manner or really tell them in the best way possible. It has too many things going on and each one of them is given equal importance (rather than appropriate importance) so that nothing can really stand out from each other that can show you, “Yes this is what needs your max attention.”

However, when it comes to the visuals, which is clearly where Zack Snyder’s expertise lies, is great. I was so happy from the trailers that I saw Snyder’s Watchmen-esque flair return to a great degree, which I believe was sorely missed for the most of Man of Steel. It feels so relieving to have some colour in this movie even though it gets really muted at places. Larry Fong’s cinematography allows each shot to move fluidly that makes those action scenes just that much better and no awkward zoom-ins like MoS. One big advantage of having all these different heroes is that they bring their own distinct tones with them which makes for great visual variety and sonic variety in the soundtrack. The presentation here is awesome. However, if one criticism has to be made on the visual side is that the CGI, though much better than Man of Steel, still feels inconsistent at places and the 3D ruins everything. But this movie is technically well made through and through.

To be honest with you, I was not one of the Batfleck haters. Sure I was surprised when it was announced but knowing from films like Argo and his love for the character, I was pretty confident he would pull it off. And by heavens does he make a great Batman. To quote Kevin Smith ‘This is by far the most cinematic Batman we have seen’. I mean he looks Batman, he has the physique of Batman and he has the presence of Batman. And that costume is just exquisite. He portrays a great Bruce Wayne as well with a suave playboy-ish charm while also letting us know just how much he doesn’t want to be at those parties and is just there for the information he can gather. Anyhow, I still think the movie did not allow Affleck to fully stretch his acting muscles. When an on-screen Batman looks so much like the comics it leaves you even more flabbergasted when he outright starts using machine guns and kills people left-right-centre. And no, it’s not because I’m not willing to accept any new interpretations of the character, and we have seen him kill before (however it must remembered that those were more tongue and cheek than this). But I at least want a clear justification for it. Sure it can be argued for that the Robin suit scene or the fact he is an old embittered Batman is it, but I still think it can be explained just a bit more concretely. Also it’s confusing that some thugs he would kill while others he would brand. Also the killing is just outrageous with exploding cars and Gatling guns. I would say that instead of Batman just killing efficiently, him being excruciatingly brutal in his action leaving thugs in agonising pain would’ve made for a much scarier version of the character by giving thugs a living hell than a swift death. But it’s subjective and I’m still stoked for a solo Batman flick.

On the other side of the ring, Henry Cavill isn’t given much to play with Superman. This is surprising because he atoning for the events of Metropolis could have made for some real moral dilemmas and a serious commentary on the super-man. There isn’t any difference when he plays Clark Kent and Superman and somehow has no charisma whatsoever. It is sad because I honestly think that he is a good actor who can get to near- Christopher Reeve levels if directed well. The Dr. Manhattan approach to Superman is a clever concept on paper but he comes across like a victim of circumstance a bit too much and is always avoiding people when he should’ve been actively trying to defend his stance. Yet we got a really ignorant Superman who doesn’t want to give a damn about humanity….until he just does at the end, somehow. Yes, Superman shouldn’t be an unsullied symbol of hope. However, the whole point of Superman is that he tries, no matter the odds stacked against. He is the guy you can depend on. Sometimes he may succeed and other times fail, but he still tries and never gives up. It’s what makes us look-up to this guy. It’s what makes him a hero.    

I was pretty surprised how much I liked Lex as what he was, even though I didn’t like him overall. At least he doesn’t have a real-estate plan this time. And he has some good interactions with Holly Hunter’s character. And that’s where the good stuff mostly ends for me. I wouldn’t place blame on Jesse Eisenberg more than on the characterisation. His motivation is also pretty confusing, again making us fill in the blanks (in a bad way). But in this case, I would blame the poor dialogue writing, which is a culprit for a lot of the vagueness in the movie. The fact is that we have come a long way from ‘mad-scientist’ Luthor to a much more high-profile and infinitely more intriguing version of him in his more White-Collar demeanour; a cool and calm intellect that serves as his edge over Superman. This version of Lex just comes across as more of an annoyance than a threatening ‘villain’. ‘Granny’s Peach Tea’ was a good one though and more moments like that could have made Lex more cunning and manipulative as we hoped he’d be. 


The supporting characters are generally good here. Among them the most prominent would be Wonder Woman. Gal Gadot was okay in it enough for me to be curious about her solo movie. Laurence Fishburne as Perry White was also good but the awkward editing places him at really off times where you can’t appreciate it. Lois Lane was made  into a damsel by having Supes save her so many times that it makes him look like her stalker. They try to give her a subplot but in all honesty it seems so filler when we could see more tense banter between Clark and Bruce. As mentioned before, I liked Jeremy Irons as Alfred. I saw more of a camaraderie between him and Bruce rather than a father-son dynamic, which is admittedly fresh. 


That brings us to the actual Batman vs Superman portion of the movie. Surprisingly there isn’t much confrontation, just 3 scenes, one of them being a 7 min fight. I believe almost everybody expected a conflict of ideologies. So I was disappointed to find out that it’s very much an externally manipulated confrontation rather than self-motivated. But to be fair, hints of it do appear, especially through Batman’s motivation. However, I don’t think they really built up to it rather well. The only one great dialogue is between Bruce and Clark, which we have already seen from the trailers. I really wanted more of it. The motivation behind Superman as I said was pretty weak and the movie also tries to ruin Batman’s as well with pretty much making him an impulsive killer at that point. Also they went for the Kryptonite route which I get you don’t have many options when you are fighting with Superman but since MoS was pretty proud to have a kryptonite-free story, I was hopeful that they would find a new twist. But they do find a new twist in the resolution of this fight. It makes sense while being really underwhelming at the same time.

Okay so the story isn’t the best, neither are the characters in my opinion, but is the action good at least? Yes,  though there isn’t much of it. As mentioned before the main fight is 7 mins. It’s ok but I wasn’t satisfied enough. I was looking for more choreography and more tension ‘in-the-moment’. My favourite action scene, like most, would be Batman in the warehouse. Well-orchestrated and at the moment I did not care whether he killed or not because at that moment, the person on the screen, was Batman. It was glorious. Then you have the main so- called ‘trinity’ fight with Doomsday. The disco eyes of Doomsday were becoming a bit sensory-overload and the shoddy development all throughout the movie did not truly invest me in this fight. And by the time the ending came it was already running way to long and I just wanted it to finish.

Maybe it is my fault that I had too big expectations from this movie. However a movie called Batman v. Superman should have been better than we what we got, regardless whether it’s for fans or not. Or maybe it shouldn’t have been called that in the first place. I hear people say it’s for comic book fans, and I will not claim that I have the most extensive knowledge in comics. However, I don’t believe that merely referencing comic book material or imagery while you ignore the core of these great characters, true justice to the source material. And at a lot of parts it relies too much on your prior knowledge of comics (which is probably why I missed out on so many subtexts). It should work as a movie first. I do presume though that ultimately all this will be a sort of ‘redemption’ arc for these heroes and that by Justice League we will truly see our heroes in their classic forms. And if they handle it well, it could be pretty damn great.


So do I think this is a bad movie? No, not at all, because movies like The Last Airbender still exist. Do I think it it’s the best thing ever? Since I appreciate classic DC and that the movie has some general filmmaking flaws, not that much. But movies are subjective. I’m just giving my opinion as unbiased as I can be. I’m still pretty curious for a lot of the upcoming movies as now we can finally see what other filmmakers can bring to this franchise. I also respect Zack Snyder and team in giving us a very different and bold vision on the big screen. That being said, I really want to urge the creative team behind this DCEU to have a little more faith in their characters as they are, because I believe the Justice League are not supposed to be brought down to our level and reflect our society too much. For me, Justice League represents the best of what humanity can be and who we can root for as champions of the Earth.   


Friday, 15 January 2016

Star Wars: The Force Awakens- A Movie Impression



"Fans are going to love it" George Lucas said. And to Disney, Star Wars' new 'overlords', that would probably be music to their ears. However, that doesn't imply that the filmmakers did not put any sort of creativity into it, 'cause they did. In fact, it looks pretty marvellous. Oh…and spoiler alert.



J.J. Abrams' style was pretty much made for Star Wars, ironically as seen in the Star Trek movies. Nevertheless, he has a good eye for spectacle and enough respect for the Franchise. As a result we see the return of real locations and practical effects. I am really happy that the sense of wonder and adventure is back and isn't bogged down by senate meetings. Coming back to the spectacle, this entry has (in my opinion) given us probably one of the most evocative imagery seen in Star Wars yet. From the beginning with a silhouette of a starship in front of a planet or Rey whizzing past giant Star Destroyers buried in the sand on her land-speeder. And even the Space Battles and Dogfights are also really top notch. And all under the grand score of John Williams. Though honestly all those fast cuts do get exhausting sometimes. Also to be noted is that this movie also maybe has the most diverse locations we have seen in one Star Wars movie.


Note that the locations are diverse for 'one' Star Wars movie, not necessarily in the series. And same goes for the story. Some plot points do feel recycled like the droid character having the secret message who is found by a person in a desert planet and has to be brought back to the rebels. That being said, it does serve as a good introduction to the series for Star Wars virgins and also a reintroduction for fans as it does sum up all the great moments of the original films in a new light. It also works in a thematic aspect where you can say that history had repeated itself. However the last straw for me was Starkiller Base, which was another Death Star but bigger! I mean why would The First Order pursue the exact same plan that destroyed their precursor organisation in the first place Nonetheless I give the movie props that it injects a lot more emotional impact into the scenes and I liked that it was to some extent the continuation of the Skywalker family saga. Mark Hamill also acted amazing with those facial expressions at the end. 

I really liked Rey; she does grow on you overtime. Even though at the surface she does seem like your typical wide-eyed protagonist but there are clear signs of deeper unexplored territories. However, I will agree she is kinda paper thin in this movie but her chemistry with Finn spices things up. Finn out of all the characters is probably the most interesting to me of the bat because of his pronounced moral dilemma that makes him leave the Stormtroopers, even though it never clearly explains and we probably will never know since we saw him confused right at his first battle so that doesn’t give us much history too. Daisy Ridley and John Boyega’s performances are pretty much why you will feel invested in the protagonists.


Alright time for the biggie, Kylo Ren or Ben Solo. Yes he is the child of Han and Leia and he kills Han Solo, which face it, was inevitable. Speaking of Han and Leia, I liked that their relationship was sort of on the rocks since Jedi and making Han the mentor character of the movie was a good move. I believe Han Solo had a pretty good character arc from careless smuggler to a father who has to take responsibilty. Anyway, I think that people who say Kylo Ren isn’t intimidating are coming with the wrong mind-set. Sure he doesn’t have that presence of Vader and is a baby face with perfect hair. And that is the point. It shows vulnerability, it shows that he is still not completely with the Dark side. And with the events transpired, maybe we will see this person become the Bad-ass that Darth Vader was over this series of films. And to be honest, no one really wants another Darth Vader per se because you cannot top Darth Vader. Kylo Ren on the other hand makes you curious about his road further it's like you're following both protagonist and antagonist develop. 


Now you might have noticed a theme with the characters that much of it is kept under wraps. I am not sure if that’s a good thing. It makes a significant impact to the depth of characters and it’s also same for the story. Too much things are left up in the air for future stuff or is rushed past for the next set-piece. At times it looks more spectacle than story. It doesn't help the movie stand on its own. Even though looks immaculate visually, a lot of the times it feels superficial. Now I do understand that Disney and Abrams had to play it safe for now considering they had to impress the old fans and also attract the new fans. I still expected more though, maybe it’s my fault. Nevertheless it’s Star Wars and it’s back for a foreseeable future probably, I just hope they tell stories and not just do fan pandering.   

ps. Do I think Rey is a Mary Sue? Well maybe yes, but again it goes on record that it really did need some more development all round.